Intellectual Property, Innovation and Entertainment We act in a advising, contractual, and contentious manner (including in court expert examinations and technical assistance activities, in addition to extrajudicial warning letters and legal measures) in the development, management, use, protection, and exploitation of intangible assets, such as copyrights, trademarks, patents, software, design, geographical indications, cultivars, technology, and business secrets. We carry out training for internal corporate areas (such as IT, R&amp;D, business, communication and marketing, and operations) and support structuring corporate knowledge management and innovation projects.&nbsp; We prepare, analyze, review, and negotiate contracts related to the creative industry, such as audiovisual and artistic productions/coproductions, and facilitation of cultural, artistic, musical, and sport events (such as sponsorship, naming rights, licensing, distribution, dissemination, and transmission); we advise on game development and commercialization contracts, analysis of image rights issues and ambush marketing; we act before the National Advertising Self-Regulation Council (CONAR); we support the authorization process for commercial promotions with the Ministry of Finance; we assist in the protection, exposure, and commercialization of fashion and other luxury items and consumer goods, especially in the digital environment, whether via B2B or B2C e-commerce, presence and dissemination of content on social media, online marketing, relationships with influencers digital, among others. Technology and Data Protection Our clients also receive strategic advice in complex negotiations and mergers and acquisitions (especially in technology and other sectors in which the main asset is Intellectual Property); in structuring, restructuring, asset valuation, acceleration, incubation, and corporate investment rounds; in structuring and reviewing business models for innovative companies and franchises; legal advice in due diligences; in licensing, transfer, outsourcing, joint development, commercialization, joint ventures, strategic technological partnerships, and contracts related to Information Technology (such as migration to cloud computing and structuring of data centers); in technical cooperation activities involving universities, ICTs under the Innovation Law, productive development partnerships (PDPs), among others.&nbsp; We support companies in structuring and reviewing projects to comply with the General Data Protection Law (LGPD); in the development and review of privacy policies and terms of use for websites, Internet usage, and cookie management policies, as well as corporate policies for the appropriate and safe use of the Internet and data-intensive technological solutions; in managing security incidents and communicating with relevant parties. We provide advice on privacy, freedom of expression, and responsibility of Internet service and content providers in light of the Marco Civil da Internet and applicable legislation.

Intellectual property, Technology and Data Protection

Our Intellectual Property team highlighted the most important news from November in the newest edition of the privacy and data protection newsletter. Click <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/LDR_2023_12_13_Boletim_LGPD_EN_62927cfa24.pdf">here</a>.

Em uma nova edição do informativo sobre privacidade e proteção de dados, nossa equipe de Propriedade Intelectual traz as notícias que foram destaque dos temas em novembro. Leia <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/LDR_2023_12_13_Boletim_LGPD_PTBR_1f62d09196.pdf">aqui</a>.&nbsp;

Informativo | Proteção de Dados no Brasil – Ed. 23 – Dezembro, 2023

Our Intellectual Property team highlighted the most important news from November in the newest edition of the privacy and data protection newsletter.…

Newsletter | Data Protection in Brazil - Edition 23 - December, 2023

Newsletter

Marcos Chucralla Moherdaui Blasi

Danilo Martins Braga

Mariana Zanardo Dessotti

The National Data Protection Authority (Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados – ANPD) is now the National Data Protection Agency, linked to the Ministry of Justice, endowed with functional, technical, decision-making, administrative, and financial autonomy – the same institutional status as other established regulatory agencies, such as ANEEL, ANATEL, and ANVISA.This change results from the entry into force of Provisional Measure No. 1,317/2025, published on September 18, 2025, and forms part of a set of measures aimed at enabling the implementation of the Digital Child and Adolescent Statute (ECA Digital), established by Law No. 15,211 of September 17, 2025.<h2>Key Aspects of the Change</h2>➜&nbsp;New regulatory status: the ANPD has been renamed the National Data Protection Agency, vested with functional, technical, decision-making, administrative, and financial autonomy. The ANPD’s official website has already been updated with the new designation.➜&nbsp;Institutional alignment: the ANPD now enjoys the same legal nature as regulatory agencies such as ANEEL, ANATEL, and ANVISA, conferring greater organizational stability and enhanced regulatory authority.➜&nbsp; Structural reinforcement: the creation of professional career tracks for data protection specialists and new positions to strengthen the Agency’s technical, operational, and supervisory capacity.<h2>Context</h2>➜&nbsp;The transformation of the ANPD into a regulatory agency occurs in parallel with the establishment of the ECA Digital, a fundamental framework for the protection of children and adolescents in digital environments.➜&nbsp; With this change, the expectation is that the Agency will be better positioned to implement the provisions of the ECA Digital and to advance Brazil’s regulatory agenda on the protection of personal data.<img src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/testeeee_d19b21eb3f.png" alt="testeeee.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_testeeee_d19b21eb3f.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_testeeee_d19b21eb3f.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_testeeee_d19b21eb3f.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_testeeee_d19b21eb3f.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="4080" height="556">Official Sources<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.gov.br/anpd/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/governo-federal-estrutura-anpd-para-assumir-competencias-do-eca-digital">Governo Federal estrutura ANPD para assumir competências do ECA Digital</a><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2025/09/18/medida-provisoria-transforma-anpd-em-agencia-reguladora">Medida provisória transforma ANPD em agência reguladora</a>

A Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD) agora é a Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados, vinculada ao Ministério da Justiça, com autonomia funcional, técnica, decisória, administrativa e financeira - o mesmo status institucional de agências reguladoras já consolidadas, como a ANEEL, ANATEL e ANVISA.A mudança decorre da entrada em vigor da&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2023-2026/2025/Mpv/mpv1317.htm">Medida Provisória nº 1.317/2025</a>, publicada em 18/09/2025, última quinta-feira, e faz parte de um conjunto de medidas destinadas a viabilizar a implementação do Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente Digital (ECA Digital), instituído pela&nbsp;<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2025/lei/L15211.htm">Lei nº 15.211, de 17 de setembro de 2025</a>.<h2>Principais pontos da mudança:</h2>➜ Novo status regulatório: a ANPD passa a se chamar Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados, com autonomia funcional, técnica, decisória, administrativa e financeira. O site da ANPD já está atualizado com a nova denominação.➜ Alinhamento institucional: a ANPD passa a ter a mesma natureza jurídica de agências reguladoras como ANEEL, ANATEL e ANVISA, o que lhe confere maior estabilidade organizacional e autoridade regulatória.➜ Reforço estrutural: criação de carreiras de especialistas em proteção de dados e de novos cargos para fortalecer a capacidade técnica, operacional e fiscalizatória da ANPD.<h2>Contexto:</h2>➜ A transformação da ANPD em agência reguladora ocorre em paralelo à criação do ECA Digital, marco fundamental para a proteção de crianças e adolescentes em ambientes digitais.➜ Com essa alteração, a expectativa é de que a ANPD tenha mais condições de implementar as disposições do ECA Digital e de dar continuidade à agenda regulatória em proteção de dados pessoais no Brasil.&nbsp; &nbsp;<img src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/testeeee_d6c653f48a.png" alt="testeeee.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_testeeee_d6c653f48a.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_testeeee_d6c653f48a.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_testeeee_d6c653f48a.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_testeeee_d6c653f48a.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="4080" height="556">Fontes oficiais: <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://Fontes oficiais •	Governo Federal estrutura ANPD para assumir competências do ECA Digital •	Medida provisória transforma ANPD em agência reguladora">Governo Federal estrutura ANPD para assumir competências do ECA Digital</a> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2025/09/18/medida-provisoria-transforma-anpd-em-agencia-reguladora">Medida provisória transforma ANPD em agência reguladora</a>

Medida Provisória transforma a ANPD em Agência Reguladora

Provisional Measure No. 1,317/2025 grants regulatory agency status to ANPD, now the National Data Protection Agency with full institutional autonomy.

Provisional Measure Converts the ANPD into a Regulatory

Provisional Measure Converts the ANPD into a Regulatory Agency

Our compliance team has extensive experience advising companies on integrity and corporate ethics projects. We are recognized for our business-oriented approach to managing and preventing legal and reputational risks for national and international clients across various industries.We support our clients in the development and implementation of integrity programs, internal training, contract reviews, and other matters related to best practices in corporate governance, including corporate fraud, anti-corruption, money laundering, human rights violations, and terrorism financing.We operate from the structuring phase of mergers and acquisitions and the capital markets, to address compliance risks identified in due diligence processes. Additionally, we have modern tools and extensive experience in conducting background checks and independent research to assess risks in hiring and to ensure compliance with our clients' compliance policies.We have also significant experience in crisis management processes and conducting independent internal investigations, both regarding the legal implications of non-compliance acts and their accounting impacts. We represent our clients in civil investigations and other inquiries conducted by the Public Prosecutor's Office, the Office of the Comptroller General (CGU), and other administrative authorities, including judicial actions such as public civil actions and administrative improbity lawsuits. &nbsp;

Compliance

Our compliance team has extensive experience advising companies on integrity and corporate ethics projects. 

Compliance | Áreas de atuação Lobo de Rizzo

Bernardo Viana

Natalia Salzedas Pinheiro da Silveira

Sérgio Varella Bruna

Matheus Leone Rodrigues Santos

On September 11, 2025, the Office of the Comptroller General (CGU) published Normative Ordinance SE/CGU No. 226, which establishes criteria and procedures for evaluating Compliance Programs, in accordance with Decree No. 12,304/2024. The regulation provides for the assessment of corporate compliance programs in three specific situations: &nbsp;<img class="image_resized" style="width:75%;" alt="Imagem1.png" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_bf3287e034.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_bf3287e034.png 245w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_bf3287e034.png 500w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_bf3287e034.png 750w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_bf3287e034.png 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000">Evaluation parameters include senior management commitment, existence of a code of ethics and compliance policies, risk management mechanisms, reporting channels, disciplinary measures, third-party due diligence, and continuous program monitoring. Factors such as company size, industry sector, and level of interaction with the public administration are also considered.For large-scale public contracts (BRL 251 million or more), the Ordinance establishes that contracts with the Federal Executive Branch must submit documents and information which evidence the implementation of the Compliance Program within thirty (30) days following the end of the six-month period from the contract’s signing.The submission must be made through the Compliance Programs Assessment and Monitoring System (SAMPI), by completing the profile and conformity forms. Companies already certified under the CGU’s Empresa Pró-Ética Program, or currently undergoing evaluation by the CGU, may be exempted from submission.The Ordinance also provides that having implemented an effective Compliance Program can be used as a tie-breaking criterion in public bids. This requirement can be demonstrated through:&nbsp;→ Self-assessment under the Pacto Brasil pela Integridade Empresarial, valid for up to twenty-four (24) months; → Inclusion in the list of companies recognized under the Empresa Pró-Ética Program; or → Assessment conducted in the past twenty-four (24) months by compatible public authorities. Public bodies and entities must explicitly include in bidding notices the possibility of using the Compliance Program as a tie-breaking criterion, in accordance with the Ordinance’s parameters.From a business and legal perspective, the Ordinance has direct implications for companies contracting with the Public Administration, particularly in large-scale contracts. Starting sixty (60) days after its publication, companies involved must ensure proper implementation of their Compliance Programs, not only to comply with legal requirements but also to potentially benefit in bidding processes by using the effectiveness of their programs as a tie-breaking criterion. &nbsp;

Em 11 de setembro de 2025, a Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU) publicou a Portaria Normativa SE/CGU nº 226, que define critérios e procedimentos para avaliação de Programas de Integridade, em conformidade com o Decreto nº 12.304/2024. A norma dispõe sobre a análise de programas de compliance corporativo em três hipóteses específicas:&nbsp;<img class="image_resized" style="width:75%;" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_b26a1b091d.png" alt="Imagem1.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_b26a1b091d.png 245w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_b26a1b091d.png 500w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_b26a1b091d.png 750w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_b26a1b091d.png 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000">Entre os parâmetros de avaliação estão o comprometimento da alta administração, existência de código de ética e políticas de integridade, mecanismos de gestão de riscos, canais de denúncia, medidas disciplinares, due diligence de terceiros e monitoramento contínuo do programa. Também serão considerados aspectos como porte, setor de atuação e grau de interação com o poder público. Para contratações públicas de grande vulto (a partir de R$ 251 milhões), a norma define que os contratos firmados com o Poder Executivo Federal deverão apresentar os documentos e informações que comprovem a implantação do Programa de Integridade em até 30 (trinta) dias após o término do prazo de 6 (seis) meses da assinatura do contrato. A comprovação deverá ser submetida por meio do Sistema de Avaliação e Monitoramento de Programas de Integridade (SAMPI), mediante o preenchimento dos formulários de perfil e de conformidade. Nesse cenário, empresas já certificadas pelo Programa Empresa Pró-Ética da CGU, ou em processo de avaliação em curso pelo órgão, poderão ser dispensadas da submissão. A nova Portaria prevê, ainda, que a existência de um Programa de Integridade efetivo pode ser utilizada como critério de desempate em licitações. A comprovação desse requisito poderá ocorrer por meio de:&nbsp;→ Autoavaliação no Pacto Brasil pela Integridade Empresarial, com validade de até 24 (vinte e quatro) meses; → Inclusão na lista de empresas reconhecidas pelo Programa Empresa Pró-Ética; ou → Avaliação realizada nos últimos 24 (vinte e quatro) meses por órgãos públicos compatíveis. Além disso, os órgãos e entidades da Administração Pública Federal devem prever expressamente nos editais de licitação a possibilidade de utilização do Programa de Integridade como critério de desempate, em conformidade com os parâmetros estabelecidos pela Portaria.Do ponto de vista empresarial e jurídico, a Portaria traz efeitos diretos para as companhias que contratam com a Administração Pública, especialmente em contratações de grande vulto. A partir de sua entrada em vigor – prevista para 60 (sessenta) dias após a publicação –, as empresas deverão estar atentas à implementação de seus Programas de Integridade, não apenas para atender às exigências legais, mas para potencialmente se beneficiar em processos licitatórios, utilizando a efetividade de seus programas como critério de desempate.

CGU define critérios e peso de Programas de Integridade para contratações com o Poder Executivo Federal

CGU sets criteria for Compliance Programs in federal contracts over BRL 251 million and as a tiebreaker in public procurement.

CGU defines criteria and weight of Compliance Programs

CGU defines criteria and weight of Compliance Programs for contracts with the Federal Executive Branch

We are advising national and foreign clients on the immediate and long-term impacts of the US tariffs on Brazilian goods and the legal risks associated with the evolving trade relationship between the countries. In August, a new 50% tariff for steel, aluminum and other imports will be added to the standard 10% rate already in place for Brazilian goods, and relevant business in both countries are suffering the consequences of the escalation.&nbsp;If you are being affected by issues such as the ones below, our firm has a dedicated multidisciplinary WorkGroup that can help you navigate the associated challenges. Please feel free to reach out to any of the partners indicated at the end of this news or, if you prefer, to the following email address that includes the whole group:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:USTariffsWorkGroup@ldr.com.br" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" title="Protected by Check Point: https://public-sam.mkt.dynamics.com/api/orgs/19354006-f580-4abe-b003-2a5f36e11719/r/y9FNaxLjhky9Sof1_fICAAcAAAA?msdynmkt_target=%7B%22TargetUrl%22%3A%22mailto%253AUSTariffsWorkGroup%2540ldr.com.br%22%2C%22RedirectOptions%22%3A%7B">USTariffsWorkGroup@ldr.com.br</a>.<img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:4086/557;" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/banner_slim_3_en_38b39b96cb.png" alt="banner slim 3 (en).png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_banner_slim_3_en_38b39b96cb.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_banner_slim_3_en_38b39b96cb.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_banner_slim_3_en_38b39b96cb.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_banner_slim_3_en_38b39b96cb.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="4086" height="557"><img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:4080/285;" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem1_77fc80d05e.png" alt="Imagem1.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_Imagem1_77fc80d05e.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_Imagem1_77fc80d05e.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_Imagem1_77fc80d05e.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_Imagem1_77fc80d05e.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="4080" height="285">•&nbsp;Economic and financial imbalance (theory of unforeseeability, excessive burden, among others);•&nbsp;Hardship and renegotiation of contractual obligations;•&nbsp;Acts of God and force majeure (tariff increases may or may not fall under the legal or contractual definition of force majeure);&nbsp;•&nbsp;Risk allocation regimes in contracts;•&nbsp;Triggering of material adverse effect clauses;&nbsp;•&nbsp;Triggering of cross-default clauses in related or linked agreements;•&nbsp;Economic and financial rebalancing in contracts with public entities, with potential regulatory discussions;•&nbsp;Modification and interpretation of dispute resolution clauses and applicable law&nbsp;•&nbsp;Interpretation and revision of fixed-price or take-or-pay clauses;&nbsp;•&nbsp;Abuse of rights and irregular exercise of penalty clauses;•&nbsp;Assessment of sectoral mechanisms and industry associations for negotiation;•&nbsp;Negotiation and mediation procedures.<img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:4080/285;" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem2_8a7c8440cc.png" alt="Imagem2.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_Imagem2_8a7c8440cc.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_Imagem2_8a7c8440cc.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_Imagem2_8a7c8440cc.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_Imagem2_8a7c8440cc.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="4080" height="285"> &nbsp;•&nbsp;Preparation to deal with potential sanctions depending on the escalation of measures taken by the US;•&nbsp;Fact-finding and risk analysis for the engagement with certain Brazilian entities;•&nbsp;Setting up crisis and contingency protocols to address new risks.<img class="image_resized" style="aspect-ratio:4080/284;" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/PI_POR_c076bbef07.png" alt="PI POR.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_PI_POR_c076bbef07.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_PI_POR_c076bbef07.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_PI_POR_c076bbef07.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_PI_POR_c076bbef07.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="4080" height="284">•&nbsp;Requirements, procedures, and potential law changes Brazil would need to implement in case it elects to adopt measures to suspend IP rights (considering the applicable local law and existing international treaties on the subject);•&nbsp;IP rights subject to suspension (specific sectors, existing rights, new rights);•&nbsp;Possible impacts on technology transfer and royalty agreements, especially involving foreign companies;•&nbsp;Practical and legal differences between the suspension of IP rights and compulsory licensing under Brazilian Industrial Property Law.<hr><h2>WorkGroup Partners</h2>Compliance&nbsp; <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/bernardo-viana-en">Bernardo Viana</a> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/sergio-varella-bruna-en">Sergio Bruna</a>Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/marcelo-frioli-droghetti-en">Marcelo Droghetti</a>Dispute Resolution <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/helena-najjar-abdo-en">Helena Abdo</a> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/luis-fernando-guerrero-en">Luis Fernando Guerrero</a>Intellectual Property <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/marcos-chucralla-moherdaui-blasi-en">Marcos Blasi</a>Investment Funds and Market Players <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/guilherme-fernandes-cooke-en">Guilherme Cooke</a>Oil and Gas <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/thiago-luiz-silva-en">Thiago Luiz</a>Power <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/joao-pedro-assis-en">João Pedro Assis</a>Tax <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/eduardo-martinelli-carvalho-en">Eduardo Carvalho</a> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/en/people/marcelo-bez-debatin-da-silveira-en/">Marcelo Silveira</a>

Estamos assessorando clientes nacionais e estrangeiros quanto aos impactos imediatos e de longo prazo das tarifas aplicadas pelos Estados Unidos sobre produtos brasileiros, bem como aos riscos jurídicos decorrentes da evolução das relações comerciais entre os dois países. Em agosto, uma nova tarifa de 50% sobre aço, alumínio e outras importações será adicionada à tarifa padrão de 10% já vigente para bens brasileiros, e empresas relevantes em ambos os países estão sofrendo as consequências dessa escalada.&nbsp;Se você está sendo impactado por questões como as listadas abaixo, nosso escritório conta com um Grupo de Trabalho multidisciplinar dedicado para ajudá-lo a enfrentar esses desafios. Fique à vontade para entrar em contato com qualquer um dos sócios listados ao final desta notícia ou, se preferir, com todo o grupo por meio do seguinte endereço: <a href="mailto:USTariffsWorkGroup@ldr.com.br" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">USTariffsWorkGroup@ldr.com.br</a>.<img class="image_resized" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/banner_slim_3_5cb3eaeddd.png" alt="banner slim 3.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/banner_slim_3_5cb3eaeddd.png 245w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/banner_slim_3_5cb3eaeddd.png 500w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/banner_slim_3_5cb3eaeddd.png 750w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/banner_slim_3_5cb3eaeddd.png 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000"><img class="image_resized" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/SC_POR_e3514bae06.png" alt="SC POR.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/SC_POR_e3514bae06.png 245w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/SC_POR_e3514bae06.png 500w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/SC_POR_e3514bae06.png 750w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/SC_POR_e3514bae06.png 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000">•&nbsp;Desequilíbrio econômico-financeiro dos contratos (teoria da imprevisão, onerosidade excessiva, entre outros);•&nbsp;Hardship e readequação de obrigações contratuais (adaptação de contratos para abarcar cláusulas gerais de revisão);•&nbsp;Caso fortuito e força maior (majorações tarifárias podem ou não se enquadrar na definição legal ou contratual de caso fortuito e força maior);•&nbsp;Regime de alocação de riscos nos contratos;•&nbsp;Configuração de efeito material adverso;•&nbsp;Desencadeamento de cláusulas de cross-default em contratos e coligados;•&nbsp;Reequilíbrio econômico-financeiro em contratos com entes públicos, com potenciais discussões regulatórias;•&nbsp;Modificação e interpretação de cláusulas de resolução de disputas e legislação aplicável;•&nbsp;Interpretação e revisão de cláusulas de preço fixo ou take-or-pay;•&nbsp;Abuso de direito e exercício irregular de cláusulas penais;•&nbsp;Verificação de mecanismos setoriais/associações de classe para negociação;•&nbsp;Engajamento em procedimentos de negociação e mediação com assessoria técnica e após análise dos itens acima.<img class="image_resized" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem2_70b7eb3035.png" alt="Imagem2.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem2_70b7eb3035.png 245w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem2_70b7eb3035.png 500w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem2_70b7eb3035.png 750w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem2_70b7eb3035.png 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000">•&nbsp;Preparação para lidar com potenciais sanções, a depender da escalada de medidas adotadas pelos EUA;•&nbsp;Apuração de fatos e análise de riscos na contratação de determinadas entidades brasileiras;•&nbsp;Implementação de protocolos de crise e contingência para lidar com novos riscos.<img class="image_resized" src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem3_294c185e76.png" alt="Imagem3.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem3_294c185e76.png 245w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem3_294c185e76.png 500w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem3_294c185e76.png 750w, https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem3_294c185e76.png 1000w" sizes="100vw" width="1000">- Requisitos, procedimentos e eventuais modificações legislativas que o Brasil precisaria implementar caso opte por adotar medidas de suspensão de direitos de PI (considerando a legislação local aplicável e os tratados internacionais existentes a respeito do tema);- Direitos de PI objeto de suspensão (setores específicos, direitos vigentes, novos direitos);- Possíveis impactos nos contratos de transferência de tecnologia e royalties, especialmente envolvendo empresas estrangeiras;- Diferenças práticas e jurídicas entre a suspensão de direitos de PI e o licenciamento compulsório previsto na Lei da Propriedade Industrial brasileira.<hr><h2>Sócios do Grupo de Trabalho</h2>Compliance&nbsp; <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/bernardo-viana">Bernardo Viana</a> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/sergio-varella-bruna">Sergio Bruna</a>Energia Elétrica <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/joao-pedro-assis">João Pedro Assis</a>Fundos de Investimento e Participantes de Mercado <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/guilherme-fernandes-cooke">Guilherme Cooke</a>Óleo e Gás <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/thiago-luiz-silva">Thiago Luiz</a>Propriedade Intelectual <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/marcos-blasi">Marcos Blasi</a>Societário, Fusões e Aquisições <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/marcelo-frioli-droghetti">Marcelo Droghetti</a>Solução de Conflitos <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/helena-najjar-abdo">Helena Abdo</a> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/luis-fernando-guerrero">Luis Fernando Guerrero</a>Tributário <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/eduardo-martinelli-carvalho">Eduardo Carvalho</a> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.ldr.com.br/pessoas/marcelo-bez-debatin-da-silveira">Marcelo Silveira</a>

Lobo de Rizzo cria Grupo de Trabalho multidisciplinar para consultas sobre riscos jurídicos relacionados ao comércio bilateral entre Brasil e EUA

Understand the legal impacts of new US tariffs on Brazilian goods and how to address disputes, compliance risks, and IP challenges in this changing scenario.

US tariffs: impacts and legal considerations

Lobo de Rizzo establishes multidisciplinary WorkGroup to advise on legal risks associated with US-Brazil bilateral trade

The Oil and Gas sector is undergoing rapid transformation, driven by increasing global demand, price fluctuations, and stricter environmental regulations. Lobo de Rizzo supports both domestic and international businesses in adapting to these evolving market conditions in Brazil.Our multidisciplinary practice covers the entire spectrum of industry activities, offering clients a comprehensive range of legal solutions.Our services include:<ul><li>Upstream – Providing regulatory advice on matters involving the National Agency of Petroleum (ANP), including bid rounds, administrative and regulatory matters, negotiating and managing Joint Operating Agreements (JOAs), and facilitating transactions for oil and gas field participations (farm-in/farm-out).</li><li>Offshore – Our team has extensive experience in advising offshore service providers, including FPSO owners, drilling rig operators, maritime support vessel companies, and regasification unit (FSRU) operators.&nbsp;</li><li>Sectoral Taxation – We provide guidance on import and export procedures, tax planning for industry-related projects, and assistance with the Special Tax Regime for the Oil &amp; Gas Industry (REPETRO) and other relevant tax incentives.</li><li>Labor Advisory – Expertise in advising on specialised work regimes for offshore personnel and emergency measures in response to labour authorities.</li><li>Natural Gas – Our team provides legal support for natural gas projects, covering offshore production flow, gas processing, transportation, distribution, and the structuring of gas-to-power initiatives. &nbsp;</li></ul>

Oil and Gas

We are well-equipped to assist our clients in addressing the challenges of energy transition in an evolving global landscape.The increasing demand for sustainable energy production and low-carbon solutions presents new operational and regulatory hurdles for businesses. Our team’s deep experience in conventional energy sectors, along with strategic collaborations with global leaders in energy transition, positions us as a trusted partner for companies navigating this shift in Brazil.We advise public entities, developers, investors, financial institutions, and alternative capital providers on understanding the complexities and opportunities associated with the transition to cleaner energy, while integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations.Our expertise includes:<ul><li>Development of renewable energy projects, including solar, wind, renewable hydrogen, ethanol, biomethane, and other biofuels.</li><li>Mergers, acquisitions, asset transactions, and company incorporations within the sector, as well as contract negotiations, due diligence, and shareholder agreements.</li><li>Structuring contracts for production, distribution, trade, import, and export of renewable energy commodities.</li><li>Project financing for the construction of platforms, refineries, solar plants, and wind farms.</li><li>Legal support in bidding processes for exploration and generation concessions.</li><li>Advisory on low-carbon strategies for major energy consumers and assistance in meeting industry decarbonization targets.&nbsp;</li></ul>

Renewables

In a constantly evolving industry, our multidisciplinary expertise allows us to address regulatory and transactional demands across the entire value chain of the electric energy sector, including the generation, transmission, distribution, and commercialization segments.We are prepared to deliver tailored solutions for structuring self-production and energy generation projects (both distributed and centralized), providing comprehensive support from the preliminary stages of auctions and the granting of authorizations and concessions to the contracting and implementation of such ventures.Our practice also includes specialized advisory services in mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;As), including regulatory due diligence and risk assessment to ensure the feasibility of each transaction. We have extensive expertise in legal structuring, forming consortia and special-purpose entities for energy generation and commercialization projects, including export and import transactions.Regarding energy commercialization, we assist in drafting, reviewing, and negotiating contracts and instruments for both the free contracting environment (ACL) and the regulated contracting environment (ACR), ensuring efficient access to and use of transmission and distribution systems through in-depth analyses of contracts such as CCT, CUST, CCD, and CUSD.Our team has significant experience in analyzing regulations issued by ANEEL and MME, as well as the Trading Rules and Procedures of CCEE and the Grid Procedures of ONS. With expertise in transmission and distribution tariff methodologies, we ensure that our clients fully understand cost structures, sectoral charges, and applicable taxes.Additionally, we provide specialized support in mediation, arbitration, and administrative and judicial litigation procedures related to energy matters, always striving for effective solutions that meet our clients' interests.

Power

Thiago Luiz Silva

Loan Reis

Maria Carolina Priolli

Brazil has taken another step towards establishing a regulatory framework for offshore wind. Through Ordinance No. 851/2025, the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME) has launched Public Consultation No. 191/2025 to gather feedback on a proposed methodology for identifying marine areas to be made available for offshore wind development. Prepared by the Energy Research Office (EPE), the proposal outlines technical and regulatory criteria to guide the identification and prioritisation of suitable areas. The initiative seeks to provide predictability to private investors while promoting the orderly, safe, and sustainable use of Brazil’s marine space.<h2>Submission period and procedure for contributions:</h2>Contributions may be submitted through the websites of the MME or Participa + Brasil within 20 days from the ordinance’s publication on 14 July 2025 — that is, until 4 August 2025.The methodology is structured around three key stages: &nbsp;<img src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/Imagem3_3f1db1c916.png" alt="Imagem3.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_Imagem3_3f1db1c916.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_Imagem3_3f1db1c916.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_Imagem3_3f1db1c916.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_Imagem3_3f1db1c916.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="3991" height="1241"> The proposal was developed in dialogue with the Offshore Wind Working Group, which includes representatives from government bodies, regulatory agencies, and the national grid operator (ONS).For stakeholders in the energy sector, this is a timely opportunity to help shape the spatial planning of offshore wind in Brazil.Our Oil &amp; Gas team is available to support the preparation of submissions or clarify any questions regarding the consultation process.

O governo brasileiro deu mais um passo rumo à consolidação do marco regulatório da geração eólica offshore. Por meio da Portaria nº 851/2025, o Ministério de Minas e Energia (MME) iniciou a Consulta Pública nº 191/2025 para discutir a metodologia de seleção de áreas a serem oferecidas em procedimentos de cessão de uso do espaço marinho. Elaborada pela Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (EPE), a proposta visa estabelecer critérios técnicos e normativos para orientar a identificação e a priorização de áreas adequadas ao desenvolvimento da fonte. A iniciativa pretende dar previsibilidade ao setor privado e assegurar que o uso dos prismas marinhos ocorra de forma ordenada, segura e sustentável.<h2>Período e forma de envio das contribuições:&nbsp;</h2>As contribuições podem ser feitas pelos sites do MME e do Participa + Brasil, pelo prazo de 20 dias a contar da publicação da Portaria nº 851/2025 (14.7.2025), ou seja, até 4 de agosto de 2025. A metodologia proposta pela EPE está estruturada em três etapas principais: &nbsp;<img src="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/informe_tiago_23ffe150f5.png" alt="informe tiago.png" srcset="https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/thumbnail_informe_tiago_23ffe150f5.png 245w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/small_informe_tiago_23ffe150f5.png 500w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/medium_informe_tiago_23ffe150f5.png 750w,https://d1nwhe1xgpgddb.cloudfront.net/large_informe_tiago_23ffe150f5.png 1000w," sizes="100vw" width="3992" height="1241">&nbsp;O modelo foi construído em diálogo com o Grupo de Trabalho Eólicas Offshore, composto por representantes do governo, de órgãos reguladores e do ONS. O prazo para envio de contribuições vai até 4 de agosto de 2025 e elas podem ser feitas pelas plataformas do MME ou do Participa + Brasil.Para os agentes do setor, trata-se de uma oportunidade para influenciar diretamente os rumos do planejamento eólico no mar brasileiro.&nbsp;Nossa equipe de Óleo e Gás está à disposição para apoiar a elaboração de contribuições ou esclarecer dúvidas sobre o processo.

Eólicas offshore: governo lança consulta pública sobre critérios de seleção de áreas

Offshore wind: Brazil opens consultation on marine area selection criteria

We are pleased to announce the expansion of our team of partners with the promotions of Bruno Laurito Pinheiro, from the Infrastructure area; and George de Magalhães Carvalho and Hugo Johan Silverio Wery, both from Corporate, Mergers and Acquisitions.These promotions reflect the firm's commitment to recognizing talents who have had the opportunity to develop their careers within Lobo de Rizzo in recent years and to strengthening our operations, in line with our growth strategy for the coming years.With extensive experience, Bruno Laurito Pinheiro has been working for over 10 years in structuring and implementing infrastructure projects, especially involving concessions and privatizations, in various sectors such as power, basic sanitation, logistics (urban transportation, highways, ports, airports and railways), health, urban furniture, public utility equipment and services, among others.Bruno Laurito Pinheiro works in all stages of structuring and implementing projects, from the conception of the legal model, through the stages of development, financing, bidding, contracting and management, including acting before audit courts and regulatory agencies (ANEEL, ANTAQ, ANP, ANVISA). He holds a degree in Law from Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC-SP) and is a member of the Infrastructure Committee of the Chamber of Business Mediation and Arbitration – Brazil (CAMARB).George de Magalhães Carvalho has extensive experience in mergers and acquisitions (M&amp;A), joint ventures structuring, and corporate reorganizations, advising both national and international clients, including publicly traded companies, private equity funds and venture capital funds. His practice spans different economic sectors, with an emphasis on innovation and technology, education and franchising. He also has significant expertise in matters related to stock options, incentive plans and executive remuneration.In the franchising sector, George specializes in strategic consulting, negotiating complex contractual instruments (including franchise and master franchise agreements) and structuring the legal framework for large national and international franchise networks. In the area of innovation and technology, his expertise includes knowledge of intellectual property, copyright and software matters and in the negotiation of complex agreements and strategic transactions where innovation and technology play a central role.George also contributes institutionally, participating in innovation and knowledge management initiatives, contributing to the development and implementation of solutions that support Lobo de Rizzo in offering cutting-edge services to its clients. He graduated in Law from Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-SP).Hugo Johan Silverio Wery has experience in mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructuring, joint venture structuring and corporate law consulting.He has solid regulatory knowledge in matters involving FIPs and asset managers and administrators, in addition to leading complex infrastructure projects, advising the government and players in sectors such as sanitation, power and ports. He also advises domestic and foreign clients on issues related to various commercial contracts. He holds a law degree from the Pontifical Catholic University (PUC-Rio).

É com satisfação que anunciamos a ampliação de nosso time de sócias e sócios com as promoções de Bruno Laurito Pinheiro, da área de Infraestrutura; e de George de Magalhães Carvalho e Hugo Johan Silverio Wery, ambos de Societário, Fusões e Aquisições.Essas promoções refletem o compromisso do escritório com o reconhecimento de talentos que tiveram a oportunidade de desenvolver suas carreiras dentro do Lobo de Rizzo nos últimos anos e com o fortalecimento da nossa atuação, em linha com nossa estratégia de crescimento para os próximos anos.Com ampla experiência, Bruno Laurito Pinheiro tem atuação consolidada, há mais de 10 anos, na estruturação e implementação de projetos de infraestrutura, envolvendo em especial concessões e privatizações em diversos setores como energia, saneamento básico, logística (transportes urbanos, rodovias, portos, aeroportos e ferrovias), saúde, mobiliário urbano, equipamentos e serviços de utilidade pública, entre outros.Bruno Laurito Pinheiro atua em todas as etapas de estruturação e implementação dos projetos, desde a concepção do modelo jurídico, passando pelas etapas de desenvolvimento, financiamento, licitação, contratação e gestão, incluindo atuação perante tribunais de contas e agências reguladoras (ANEEL, ANTT, ANTAQ, ANP, ANVISA). É graduado em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC-SP) e membro do Comitê de Infraestrutura da Câmara de Mediação e Arbitragem Empresarial – Brasil (CAMARB).George de Magalhães Carvalho possui ampla experiência em operações de fusões e aquisições (M&amp;A), estruturação de joint ventures e reorganizações societárias, assessorando clientes nacionais e internacionais, incluindo companhias abertas, fundos de private equity, e fundos de venture capital. Sua atuação abrange diversos setores da economia, com destaque em inovação e tecnologia, educação e franquias. Também possui experiência significativa em matéria de stock options, planos de incentivos e remuneração de executivos.No setor de franquias, George é especializado em consultoria estratégica, negociação de instrumentos contratuais complexos (incluindo contratos de franquia e master franquia) além da estruturação jurídica de negócios de grandes redes de franquia nacionais e internacionais. Na área de inovação e tecnologia, sua experiência inclui conhecimento em propriedade intelectual, direitos autorais e software, além da negociação de acordos complexos e transações estratégicas onde temas de inovação e tecnologia desempenham um papel central.George também atua institucionalmente, participando de iniciativas ligadas à inovação e gestão do conhecimento, contribuindo para o desenvolvimento e a implementação de soluções que apoiam o Lobo de Rizzo na oferta de serviços de ponta aos seus clientes. Ele é graduado em Direito pela Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-SP).Hugo Johan Silverio Wery tem experiência em operações de fusões e aquisições, reestruturações societárias, estruturações de joint ventures e consultoria em direito societário.Possui sólido conhecimento regulatório em questões envolvendo FIPs e gestores e administradores de recursos, além de liderar projetos complexos de infraestrutura, com assessoria ao poder público e a players de setores como saneamento, energia e portos. Adicionalmente, aconselha clientes nacionais e estrangeiros em questões relacionadas a contratos comerciais diversos. É graduado em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica (PUC-Rio).&nbsp;

Lobo de Rizzo promove sócios nas áreas de Infraestrutura e Societário, Fusões e Aquisições

Institutional

Lobo de Rizzo promotes partners in Infrastructure and M&A

We provide legal advice on all human resources practices, assisting our clients in the application of labor rules and creation of strategic solutions in matters of professionals recruiting; work schedules and compensation, forms of hiring, compensation, and offering of benefits; workplace safety; payroll and personnel department issues; career plans and job descriptions; and training.&nbsp;In the labor relations field, we have established experience in identifying alternative forms of compensation for executives, such as stock option plans, bonuses and commission programs, and profit-sharing plans (PLR). Our practice also includes the preparation and review of offer letters, contracts, agreements (exclusivity, non-compete, confidentiality, and data protection), rules and policies for business professionals.&nbsp;When it comes to resolving disputes, we represent our clients' interests in complex labor lawsuits, tax assessments, out-of-court settlements, as well as proceedings before the Labor Public Prosecutor's Office or involving trade unions, including through negotiation of collective conventions and collective bargaining agreements.

Labor

Fabio Medeiros

Maurício Reis

The Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) has ordered the suspension of all ongoing lawsuits in the country that discuss the hiring of professionals as legal entities or independent contractors. The decision was made under Topic 1.389 (leading case RE 1.532.603), which will be judged with general repercussion, and addresses three fundamental questions:<ul><li>Who should judge these cases: Labor Courts or Common Courts?</li><li>To what extent is it lawful to hire legal entities/independent contractors, considering companies' freedom of organization and professionals' autonomy of will?</li><li>Who bears the burden of proving whether fraud occurred or not: the professional or the company?</li></ul>The decision exposes a scenario of growing legal uncertainty: while the Supreme Court has recognized the validity of different forms of productive organization, part of the Labor Courts continue in the opposite direction, generating conflicting decisions and instability in contractual relationships.What this means for companiesAlthough the lawsuits are temporarily suspended, the legal risk persists – and how each company structures itself today can be decisive when the final judgment occurs.More than ever, companies (through their legal, HR, and compliance departments) need to:<ul><li>Review service proposals and contracts, especially with professionals who work individually and personally: language, scope, autonomy clauses, and absence of subordination;</li><li>Create evidence of providers' effective independence (e.g., no requirement for working hours, relativization of exclusivity obligations, and format of service execution);</li><li>Reassess internal policies and train leadership, ensuring that practice reflects the contractual model adopted – inconsistency between the type of contract and reality is the greatest risk factor;</li><li>Monitor suspended lawsuits and evaluate impacts on labor liabilities, with contingency plans and adequate provisioning for risk.</li></ul>Future opportunitiesDespite the current tension, the judgment of Topic 1.389 may represent a relevant turning point for the business environment in Brazil, with greater predictability for hiring via service provision contracts, provided it is done in a lawful and well-structured manner.For companies with robust operations or flexible service provision models, this is a strategic moment to review structures, mitigate risks, and position themselves for a potentially more stable and legally predictable future scenario. Beyond legal protection, being prepared for this new environment can mean a competitive advantage: companies that correctly structure their hiring processes can benefit from greater operational flexibility, cost reduction, and attractiveness in the labor market.Our team has been closely monitoring the progress of this topic in the Supreme Court and has been advising companies on reviewing contracts and internal practices – always focusing on legal protection and adapting hiring methods to business needs.

O Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) determinou a suspensão de todos os processos em andamento no país que discutem a contratação de profissionais como pessoa jurídica ou autônomos. A decisão foi tomada no âmbito do Tema 1.389 (leading case RE 1.532.603), que será julgado com repercussão geral, e trata de três questões fundamentais:<ul><li>Quem deve julgar essas ações: a Justiça do Trabalho ou a Justiça Comum?</li><li>Até que ponto é lícita a contratação de PJ/autônomos, considerando a liberdade de organização das empresas e a autonomia de vontade do profissional?</li><li>Quem tem o ônus de provar se houve ou não fraude: o profissional ou a empresa?</li></ul>A decisão expõe um cenário de insegurança jurídica crescente: enquanto o STF tem reconhecido a validade de diferentes formas de organização produtiva, parte da Justiça do Trabalho segue em sentido contrário, gerando decisões conflitantes e instabilidade nas relações contratuais.O que isso significa para as empresas Embora os processos estejam temporariamente suspensos, o risco jurídico persiste – e a forma como cada empresa se estrutura hoje pode ser decisiva quando o julgamento final ocorrer.Mais do que nunca, as empresas (por meio dos departamentos jurídico, de RH e de compliance) precisam:<ul><li>Revisar propostas e contratos de prestação de serviços, principalmente com profissionais que atuem individualmente e com pessoalidade: linguagem, escopo, cláusulas de autonomia e ausência de subordinação;</li><li>Criar evidências da efetiva independência dos prestadores (ex: não exigência de jornada de trabalho, relativização de obrigações de exclusividade e formato da execução dos serviços);</li><li>Reavaliar políticas internas e treinar a liderança, garantindo que a prática reflita o modelo contratual adotado – a incoerência entre o tipo de contrato e a realidade é o maior fator de risco;</li><li>Monitorar ações judiciais suspensas e avaliar impactos no passivo trabalhista, com planos de contingência e provisionamento adequados ao risco.</li></ul>Oportunidades futuras Apesar da tensão atual, o julgamento do Tema 1.389 pode representar um ponto de inflexão relevante para o ambiente de negócios no Brasil, com maior previsibilidade para a contratação via contrato de prestação de serviços, desde que feita de forma lícita e bem estruturada.Para empresas com operações robustas ou modelos flexíveis de prestação de serviços, este é um momento estratégico para revisar estruturas, mitigar riscos e se posicionar para um possível cenário futuro mais estável e juridicamente previsível. Além da proteção legal, estar preparado para esse novo ambiente pode significar uma vantagem competitiva: empresas que estruturarem corretamente suas contratações poderão usufruir de maior flexibilidade operacional, redução de custos e atratividade no mercado de trabalho.Nossa equipe tem acompanhado de perto o andamento do tema no STF e já vem assessorando empresas na revisão de contratos e das práticas internas – sempre com foco na proteção jurídica e adequação das modalidades de contratação às necessidades do negócio.&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;